AFI 14-104 PDF

Home  /   AFI 14-104 PDF

Supersedes: AFI , 16 April Certified by: AF/A2Z. (Mr. Joseph D. Yount). Pages: This publication implements Air Force Policy. See Air Force Instruction (AFI) Volume 1, Criminal Investi- Intelligence Components That Affect US Persons, and AFI AFI , Assistance to Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies; AFI , Intelligence Oversight INDEX AAFES , Abandonment Abuse of exchange.

Author: JoJozshura Vudoran
Country: Comoros
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 5 August 2010
Pages: 222
PDF File Size: 20.33 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.30 Mb
ISBN: 684-7-97097-999-9
Downloads: 27253
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Brar

The EPA 14-14 using drones to spy on cattle ranchers in Nebraska and Iowa in order to make sure that farmers dispose of waste properly. For context, ISR training conducted in the United States involves collection of information on US persons and private 1-4104, but they are usually not identifiable and when they are identifiable, by law you can’t actually do anything with the information collected.

You mention drone training is an aspect allegedly connected to these documents and directives. At that time, the officer asked them to join him sitting at a nearby bench and proceeded to show them, on his laptop, overhead imagery of their boat, taken at numerous times during their outing. The opinions of our members are afl those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.

U.S. Air Force Instruction: Domestic Imagery Requests for U.S. Missions

And wfi wouldn’t even see it coming. It looks like you’re using an Ad Blocker. Slip a GPS tracker on a targeted vehicle then have a drone home in on the signal. I can’t get the PDF to open on my computer at the moment, so I don’t know if this is cleared up in the document – but I’ll ask: What ever happened to the military not being able to operate on US soil 14-140 its own citizens. The current limit on red snapper is two per person. The wording of the PDF and it’s contents actually look legitimate.


If it is real Any such data collected under that authority is controlled by civilian agencies or the Coast Guard.

U.S. Air Force Instruction: Domestic Imagery Requests for U.S. Missions | Public Intelligence

Just wait till the operators who have been killing civilians on purpose in affy land get behind the controls and start killing them here. Don’t get me wrong, that’s an awesome capability, but it shouldn’t be used to prey upon law abiding citizens’ and their property. Maybe “it’s his first day” type excuses are meant to act as the “weather balloon” excuse for UFOs if ever the drone op had a mishap and questions were asked? They claim they saw no aircraft or other vessels near them as they fished.

He greeted them and asked them how many fish they had on board. Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker. Two men go out looking for red snapper one day.

Originally posted by xuenchen Can somebody explain what this is? In ati, they don’t retain any data on US persons unless authorized to do so by law. Wack a doodle White House. Is it possible that the training of “pilots” on drones takes place within a possible domestic ‘operation’?



I’m a tax-payer damn it. Cattle ranchers are already being spied upon by the epa.

Put ’em on the borders or keep them out of my comfort zone. The bit afj training prohibits collecting imagery of identified US persons or private property for training purposes unless authorized by law and the Secretary of Defense. Needless to say, these two men were rather disturbed. This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.

While I don’t agree with them overfishing, I can see why they would be upset. It’s excerpts from the Air Force’s data retention policy for information collected on US persons.

One might spend hours following a series of anonymous vehicles, seeking out unusual geographic or man-made features and describing them, or loitering over a busy shopping mall, counting the number of vehicles that come and go.

I just read the PDF. The men lied and said two fish each.

The imagery provided was good enough to identify 14–104 vessel, themselves, and the exact number of fish they had. They claim to have been fishing about 12 or so miles from shore.

Drone season,but I bet it doesn’t taste like chicken!