Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science (French: Impostures . Richard Dawkins, in a review of this book, said regarding the discussion of . retrieved 2 July ; Richard Dawkins, “Postmodernism Disrobed. Yes, there are many “postmodern” papers and books which make absolutely no sense and Dawkins is right to make fun of them. Applying the. Postmodernism disrobed. Authors: Dawkins, Richard. Affiliation: AA(Richard Dawkins is at the Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford.
|Published (Last):||5 July 2007|
|PDF File Size:||17.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.28 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Using magical thinking to reason about scientific phenomena sounds just as out of place as using the scientific method to judge art.
Naturally, the second part is often implied, but it has to be there — otherwise, the sentence is meaningless. Dawkins knows his field, but his sophomoric understanding of philosophy is embarassing. Can you absolutely say whether there is or is not a supernatural being? Can you summarize the internet in a paragraph and reasonably hope to offer a complete description of all of its various facets? A few years ago there was the so-called Bogdanov Affair in physics, which some people claimed was a “reverse Sokal hoax” i.
The problem is that it’s not Dawkins’ or Chomsky’s academic articles that have showed up on HN, it’s the other stuff. Postmodernism makes sense if you just assume that it’s satire, and everyone discussing it is in on the joke. One of his examples is where Irigaray’s work is used to justify sloppy thinking about feminism in science education.
He strikes me as an aloof academician with dawins social skills and no empathy with the rest of mankind. Find More Posts by Humes fork.
The concept, however, is postmodern, as in: What distinguishes “truth” from “absolute truth”? Two of my professors were actually instrumental in getting legal restrictions dawoins payday loans enacted in Washington. Estragon on June 7, Hmm, can someone point me to the documentation for Hacker News’s markup system, please? It can also be harmful. Dawkins enjoys himself beating a dead horse.
IsaacL on June 7, Thanks for your thoughtful responses. Postmodernism is also fragmented as seen in contemporary art and so called “hodge-podge cocktail of random bullshit” is a characteristic of such.
I didn’t read it at the time, but the philosophy department I studied in were already completely on board with its message and they despised post-modernist philosophy. It’s possible that my guess is wrong, but you’ve provided very little evidence on this point. And of course there’s always Umberto Eco: For me it has a prancing, high-stepping quality, full of self-importance; elevated indeed, but in the balletic manner, disrpbed stopping from time to time in studied attitudes, as if awaiting an outburst of applause.
In general, our conversation seems to fit the following pattern: Post-modernism in the sense of this type of thing, disrobef arose and mostly deals with literature, where imagery, symbolism, and metaphor are the main carriers of meaning rather than spelling things out literally. Find More Posts by Mark6. We all wear masks, as the old saying goes. Just to take on , the difference between computer science papers and the postmodern papers that involve physics is that while both may seem unintelligible to someone unskilled in the field, real computer science papers actually mean something if you know the terminology.
But they do not represent all of postmodernism. Interfering in the Psotmodernism to stop genocide?
I always thought of postmodernism as smashing ppstmodernism, sticking it all into a kaleidoscope and spinning it around at your whim. Last edited by Susheel ; 19th April at Not all combinations are equally likely.
A colleague of mine who is a feminist post-modernist and is especially fond of Foucault recently wrote a Sociology Masters paper on the HPV virus. In order to do that without being downvoted, you have to provide a compelling argument.
It doesn’t mean those things will cease to exist, but that what made them worthy of our attention was going to ‘end’. This is akin to ID’ers saying that equally random assembly combinations are impossible in a single so evolution disroged impossible.
You keep using dawkine word. Originally Posted by Humes fork Postmodernism Disrobed: But what is the relationship between “agreement” and “truth”? The evidence the article gave was a single quote by him.
He wrote a book on evolution at the genetic level, The Selfish Gene.