Court in the Jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case and “restored in full” DA case verdict shows that the corrupt cannot escape from law. The Supreme Court verdict in the disproportionate assets case should The DVAC, thanks to former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s hostility, was. SC verdict accuses Jayalalithaa as a mastermind who misused her public Highlighting that the Jayalalithaa disporportionate assets case.
|Published (Last):||20 April 2004|
|PDF File Size:||4.40 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.35 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Rosiah ordered operations to maintain law and order and, while the police said that acse situation was under control, opposition parties complained of violence. HC rejects his petition saying the order of the special court imposing cost was right. On 11 MayJayalalithaa was acquitted of all charges by the Karnataka High Court, causing wild celebrations by supporters.
But from all accounts he stood up to enormous threats and intimidation. SC extends Jayalalithaa’s bail by four months. The court convicted Jayalalithaa, Sasikala and the others under charges of illegal property acquisition.
VK Sasikala sentenced to four years imprisonment by trial court.
Kumaraswamy in the Karnataka High Court did not even bother to “appraise the evidence available” and stuck to whatever the income tax authorities found in favour of the accused persons.
Follow madarassi Tuesday, February 14, – Jayalalithaa was in the news for Sudhakaran’s grand wedding with Sivaji Ganesan’s granddaughter which was popularly known as “mother of all weddings”. On 17 OctoberSupreme Court granted two months bail and suspended her sentence. CM-in-waiting Sasikala is one of the accused in the case, and a negative verdict could affect her run to power.
Requests for a VVIP cell and medical treatment were denied. The Supreme Court dismissed the High Court finding that the percentage of disproportionate assets were only 8. In his reply, senior advocate Harin Raval for Jayalalithaa questioned Karnataka’s locus standi to file an appeal against the High Court judgment setting aside the attachment of the companies’ assets.
Awards four years’ prison term to Jayalalithaa, slaps Rs crore fine. Views Read Edit View history. It was stipulated that the appeal must be completed within three months.
The governor of Tamil Nadu, K. The disproportionate asset asset against Jayalalithaa goes way back to her chief ministerial tenure that began in The abatement of charges however does not rub off the smear of ignominy the Supreme Court piled on Jayalalithaa’s political legacy in its page judgment. The court said Jayalalithaa “knew fully well that Sasikala would be dealing with her funds credited to her account in Jaya Publications”.
Jayalalithaa moves Karnataka HC challenging conviction, seeks bail. She was initially convicted for misusing her office during her tenure of — Jayalalithaa passed away on December 5 last year.
Of course, the powers that be were not exactly happy at the extent of courtesy we were extending to Jayalalithaa. Inseveral prosecution witnesses resiled from their earlier depositions when Jayalalithaa was acquitted by Madras High Court. Judgement was delayed because Anbazhagan petitioned the Supreme Court against the appointment of Bhavani Singh as prosecutor.
Without this facility in law, many of our VIP offenders would go scot-free. JayalalithaaSasikala NatarajanIlavarasi, V.
Justice Roy said the case judvement “startling” in the way corruption was carried out by the accused persons with sheer impunity. That in turn would mean that special court judge Justice Cunha’s judgment, convicting Sasikala, is restored. Jayalalithaa ceases to be CM.
Follow Jayalalithaa Follow Disproportionate assets case Follow judgemeng court to deliver verdict. Then Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy filed a disproportionate assets case against her based on ajyalalithaa income tax report in The apex court will decide on Karnataka government’s pleas challenging the acquittal of the two leaders in the assets case.
A riskier future if case referred back to Karnataka HC There is also a possibility that the Supreme Court will ‘remand’ refer back the case to the Karnataka High Court.
Panneerselvam to become Chief Minister. Sasikala, of hatching one criminal conspiracy after other jaayalalithaa Poes Garden to launder the ill-gotten wealth of Jayalalithaa for purchasing huge properties in the names of “masked fronts.
It was an action independent of the DVAC and in an entirely different case. I was deeply disappointed, and was worried that all my efforts had been wasted by the most irrational judicial order by the single Karnataka judge, with its strange arithmetic.
Sasikala judgemeng in DA case; can’t contest elections for 10 years.